"Cryopreservation" is a descriptor in the National Library of Medicine's controlled vocabulary thesaurus,
MeSH (Medical Subject Headings). Descriptors are arranged in a hierarchical structure,
which enables searching at various levels of specificity.
Preservation of cells, tissues, organs, or embryos by freezing. In histological preparations, cryopreservation or cryofixation is used to maintain the existing form, structure, and chemical composition of all the constituent elements of the specimens.
Descriptor ID |
D015925
|
MeSH Number(s) |
E01.370.225.500.620.760.160 E01.370.225.750.600.760.160 E02.792.156 E05.200.500.620.760.160 E05.200.750.600.760.160 E05.760.156
|
Concept/Terms |
Cryonic Suspension- Cryonic Suspension
- Cryonic Suspensions
- Suspension, Cryonic
- Suspensions, Cryonic
|
Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more general than "Cryopreservation".
Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more specific than "Cryopreservation".
This graph shows the total number of publications written about "Cryopreservation" by people in this website by year, and whether "Cryopreservation" was a major or minor topic of these publications.
To see the data from this visualization as text,
click here.
Year | Major Topic | Minor Topic | Total |
---|
1995 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
1996 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
1997 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
1998 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
1999 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
2000 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
2001 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
2002 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
2003 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
2004 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
2005 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
2006 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
2008 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
2009 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
2010 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
2011 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
2012 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
2013 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
2014 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
2015 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
2016 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
2017 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
2018 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
2019 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
2020 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
2021 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
2023 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
2025 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
To return to the timeline,
click here.
Below are the most recent publications written about "Cryopreservation" by people in Profiles.
-
Klimczak AM, Osman E, Esbert M, Yildirim RM, Whitehead C, Herlihy NS, Hanson BM, Roberts LM, Seli E, Scott RT. A randomized controlled trial comparing embryo vitrification with slush nitrogen to liquid nitrogen in women undergoing frozen embryo transfer: embryology and clinical outcomes. Hum Reprod. 2025 Mar 01; 40(3):426-433.
-
Vanderhoff A, Lanes A, Go K, Dobson L, Ginsburg E, Patel J, Srouji SS. Multiple embryo manipulations in PGT-A cycles may result in inferior clinical outcomes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2024 02; 48(2):103619.
-
Go KJ, Hudson C. Deep technology for the optimization of cryostorage. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023 Aug; 40(8):1829-1834.
-
Hanson BM, Kim JG, Suarez SI, Ackerman BK, Comito CE, Pangasnan R, Seli E, Hong KH, Scott RT. Embryology outcomes after oocyte vitrification with super-cooled slush nitrogen are similar to outcomes with conventional liquid nitrogen: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2022 01; 117(1):106-114.
-
Taylor D, Germano J, Song Y, Hadj-Moussa H, Marek-Iannucci S, Dhanji R, Sin J, Czer LSC, Storey KB, Gottlieb RA. Hypothermia promotes mitochondrial elongation In cardiac cells via inhibition of Drp1. Cryobiology. 2021 10; 102:42-55.
-
Bishop LA, Gunn J, Jahandideh S, Devine K, Decherney AH, Hill MJ. Endometriosis does not impact live-birth rates in frozen embryo transfers of euploid blastocysts. Fertil Steril. 2021 02; 115(2):416-422.
-
Hanson BM, Franasiak JM. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation is standard of care in prepubertal patients, but does it have to be? Fertil Steril. 2020 08; 114(2):277-278.
-
Bayefsky MJ, DeCherney AH, King LP. Respecting autonomy-a call for truth in commercial advertising for planned oocyte cryopreservation. Fertil Steril. 2020 04; 113(4):743-744.
-
Hanson BM, Kaser DJ, Franasiak JM. Male Infertility and the Future of In?Vitro Fertilization. Urol Clin North Am. 2020 May; 47(2):257-270.
-
Tiegs AW, Sun L, Patounakis G, Scott RT. Worth the wait? Day 7 blastocysts have lower euploidy rates but similar sustained implantation rates as Day 5 and Day 6 blastocysts. Hum Reprod. 2019 09 29; 34(9):1632-1639.