"Pregnancy Rate" is a descriptor in the National Library of Medicine's controlled vocabulary thesaurus,
MeSH (Medical Subject Headings). Descriptors are arranged in a hierarchical structure,
which enables searching at various levels of specificity.
The ratio of the number of conceptions (CONCEPTION) including LIVE BIRTH; STILLBIRTH; and fetal losses, to the mean number of females of reproductive age in a population during a set time period.
| Descriptor ID |
D018873
|
| MeSH Number(s) |
E05.318.308.985.775 G08.686.705 N01.224.935.849 N06.850.505.400.975.775 N06.850.520.308.985.775
|
| Concept/Terms |
Pregnancy Rate- Pregnancy Rate
- Rates, Pregnancy
- Pregnancy Rates
- Rate, Pregnancy
Pregnancy Rate, Live-Birth- Pregnancy Rate, Live-Birth
- Live-Birth Pregnancy Rates
- Pregnancy Rate, Live Birth
- Pregnancy Rates, Live-Birth
- Rate, Live-Birth Pregnancy
- Rates, Live-Birth Pregnancy
- Live-Birth Pregnancy Rate
- Live Birth Pregnancy Rate
|
Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more general than "Pregnancy Rate".
Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more specific than "Pregnancy Rate".
This graph shows the total number of publications written about "Pregnancy Rate" by people in this website by year, and whether "Pregnancy Rate" was a major or minor topic of these publications.
To see the data from this visualization as text,
click here.
| Year | Major Topic | Minor Topic | Total |
|---|
| 2006 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 2007 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 2008 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| 2009 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| 2010 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| 2011 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| 2014 | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| 2015 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| 2016 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| 2017 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 2018 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| 2019 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| 2020 | 1 | 10 | 11 |
| 2021 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| 2022 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
To return to the timeline,
click here.
Below are the most recent publications written about "Pregnancy Rate" by people in Profiles.
-
Moawad G, Kheil MH, Ayoubi JM, Klebanoff JS, Rahman S, Sharara FI. Adenomyosis and infertility. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022 May; 39(5):1027-1031.
-
Klimczak AM, Herlihy NS, Scott CS, Hanson BM, Kim JG, Titus S, Seli E, Scott RT. B-cell lymphoma 6 expression is not associated with live birth in a normal responder in?vitro fertilization population. Fertil Steril. 2022 02; 117(2):351-358.
-
Franasiak JM, Alecsandru D, Forman EJ, Gemmell LC, Goldberg JM, Llarena N, Margolis C, Laven J, Schoenmakers S, Seli E. A review of the pathophysiology of recurrent implantation failure. Fertil Steril. 2021 12; 116(6):1436-1448.
-
Hanson BM, Kim JG, Suarez SI, Ackerman BK, Comito CE, Pangasnan R, Seli E, Hong KH, Scott RT. Embryology outcomes after oocyte vitrification with super-cooled slush nitrogen are similar to outcomes with conventional liquid nitrogen: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2022 01; 117(1):106-114.
-
Glatthorn HN, Hanson BM, Kim JG, Herlihy NS, Klimczak AM, Hong KH, Seli E, Scott RT. Individual culture leads to decreased blastocyst formation but does not affect pregnancy outcomes in the setting of a single, vitrified-warmed euploid blastocyst transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 Aug; 38(8):2157-2164.
-
Pirtea P, Scott RT, de Ziegler D, Ayoubi JM. Recurrent implantation failure: how common is it? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2021 06 01; 33(3):207-212.
-
Hanson BM, Tao X, Hong KH, Comito CE, Pangasnan R, Seli E, Jalas C, Scott RT. Noninvasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy exhibits high rates of deoxyribonucleic acid amplification failure and poor correlation with results obtained using trophectoderm biopsy. Fertil Steril. 2021 06; 115(6):1461-1470.
-
Pirtea P, De Ziegler D, Tao X, Sun L, Zhan Y, Ayoubi JM, Seli E, Franasiak JM, Scott RT. Rate of true recurrent implantation failure is low: results of three successive frozen euploid single embryo transfers. Fertil Steril. 2021 01; 115(1):45-53.
-
Franasiak JM. Finding a retained embryo after attempted embryo transfer: How does it impact outcomes? Fertil Steril. 2020 10; 114(4):745.
-
Franasiak JM. Follicle-stimulating hormone dosage negatively associated with live birth in donor/recipient model: a case for milder donor stimulation? Fertil Steril. 2020 09; 114(3):498-499.