"Peer Review" is a descriptor in the National Library of Medicine's controlled vocabulary thesaurus,
MeSH (Medical Subject Headings). Descriptors are arranged in a hierarchical structure,
which enables searching at various levels of specificity.
An organized procedure carried out by a select committee of professionals in evaluating the performance of other professionals in meeting the standards of their specialty. Review by peers is used by editors in the evaluation of articles and other papers submitted for publication. Peer review is used also in the evaluation of grant applications. It is applied also in evaluating the quality of health care provided to patients.
| Descriptor ID |
D010380
|
| MeSH Number(s) |
F01.829.316.549 I01.880.604.640 N03.706.700
|
| Concept/Terms |
Peer Review- Peer Review
- Review, Peer
- Peer Reviews
- Reviews, Peer
|
Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more general than "Peer Review".
Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more specific than "Peer Review".
This graph shows the total number of publications written about "Peer Review" by people in this website by year, and whether "Peer Review" was a major or minor topic of these publications.
To see the data from this visualization as text,
click here.
| Year | Major Topic | Minor Topic | Total |
|---|
| 2003 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| 2007 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| 2010 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 2011 | 4 | 1 | 5 |
| 2012 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| 2013 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 2017 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 2018 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 2020 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 2021 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 2022 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 2023 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
To return to the timeline,
click here.
Below are the most recent publications written about "Peer Review" by people in Profiles.
-
Lambrechts MJ, Schroeder GD, Kia C, Makanji HS. Is it Time to Change the Peer Review Process? Clin Spine Surg. 2023 07 01; 36(6):221-223.
-
Kachooei A, Bachoura A, Hirsch D, Beredjiklian PK. Predatory Journals in Orthopaedic Surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2023 Feb 15; 31(4):181-188.
-
Stark M, Markowitz M, Woods B. Predatory Publishing Practices. Clin Spine Surg. 2022 04 01; 35(3):127-128.
-
Sataloff RT, Bush ML, Chandra R, Chepeha D, Fisher EW, Goldenberg D, Hanna EY, Kerschner JE, Kraus DH, Krouse JH, Li D, Link M, Lustig LR, Selesnick SH, Sindwani R, Smith RJ, Tysome J, Weber PC, Welling DB. Systematic and other reviews: Criteria and complexities. Am J Otolaryngol. 2021 Sep-Oct; 42(5):102957.
-
Kalavar M, Watane A, Wu D, Sridhar J, Mruthyunjaya P, Parikh R. Single-Blind and Double-Blind Peer Review: Effects on National Representation. Semin Ophthalmol. 2022 Jan 02; 37(1):11-16.
-
Lee RK, Cohen M, David N, Matalon T. Transitioning to Peer Learning: Lessons Learned. J Am Coll Radiol. 2021 Mar; 18(3 Pt B):499-506.
-
Jette DU, Hunter SJ, Burkett L, Langham B, Logerstedt DS, Piuzzi NS, Poirier NM, Radach LJL, Ritter JE, Scalzitti DA, Stevens-Lapsley JE, Tompkins J, Zeni J. Physical Therapist Management of Total Knee Arthroplasty. Phys Ther. 2020 08 31; 100(9):1603-1631.
-
Barnhart KT, Legro RS, Scott RT. Data sharing requirements: perspectives from three authors. Fertil Steril. 2018 01; 109(1):44-47.
-
Butler JS, Sebastian AS, Kaye ID, Wagner SC, Morrissey PB, Schroeder GD, Kepler CK, Vaccaro AR. Understanding Traditional Research Impact Metrics. Clin Spine Surg. 2017 05; 30(4):164-166.
-
Friedman DP, Smith NS. Impact of a Collaborative Radiology Utilization Management Program: Does the Specialty of the Referring Provider Matter? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Jul; 207(1):121-5.