Visual Field Tests

"Visual Field Tests" is a descriptor in the National Library of Medicine's controlled vocabulary thesaurus, MeSH (Medical Subject Headings). Descriptors are arranged in a hierarchical structure, which enables searching at various levels of specificity.

MeSH information

Definition | Details | More General Concepts | Related Concepts | More Specific Concepts

Method of measuring and mapping the scope of vision, from central to peripheral of each eye.

Descriptor ID	D058609
MeSH Number(s)	E01.370.380.850.962
Concept/Terms	Visual Field Tests Visual Field Tests Field Test, Visual Field Tests, Visual Test, Visual Field Tests, Visual Field Visual Field Test Visual Field Exam Exam, Visual Field Exams, Visual Field Field Exam, Visual Field Exams, Visual Visual Field Exams Campimetry Campimetry Campimetries Tangent Screen Exam Tangent Screen Exam Exam, Tangent Screen Exams, Tangent Screen Screen Exam, Tangent Screen Exams, Tangent Tangent Screen Exams Perimetry Perimetry Perimetries Automated Perimetry Exam Automated Perimetry Exam Automated Perimetry Exams Exam, Automated Perimetry Exams, Automated Perimetry Perimetry Exam, Automated Perimetry Exams, Automated

Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more general than "Visual Field Tests".

Analytical, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Techniques and Equipment [E]
Diagnosis [E01]
Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures [E01.370]
Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological [E01.370.380]
Vision Tests [E01.370.380.850]
Visual Field Tests [E01.370.380.850.962]

Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is related to "Visual Field Tests".

Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more specific than "Visual Field Tests".

publications

Timeline | Most Recent

This graph shows the total number of publications written about "Visual Field Tests" by people in this website by year, and whether "Visual Field Tests" was a major or minor topic of these publications.

Bar chart showing 122 publications over 27 distinct years, with a maximum of 11 publications in 2016

To see the data from this visualization as text, click here.

Year	Major Topic	Minor Topic	Total
1998	0	1	1
1999	0	3	3
2000	1	2	3
2001	0	2	2
2002	2	3	5
2003	0	5	5
2004	0	1	1
2005	0	3	3
2006	1	1	2
2007	1	5	6
2008	0	3	3
2009	0	3	3
2010	2	4	6
2011	1	6	7
2012	1	4	5
2013	0	2	2
2014	0	5	5
2015	1	9	10
2016	0	11	11
2017	1	2	3
2018	2	2	4
2019	1	7	8
2020	0	7	7
2021	2	5	7
2022	1	1	2
2023	1	1	2
2024	4	2	6

Below are the most recent publications written about "Visual Field Tests" by people in Profiles.

Shi M, Lokhande A, Tian Y, Luo Y, Eslami M, Kazeminasab S, Elze T, Shen LQ, Pasquale LR, Wellik SR, De Moraes CG, Myers JS, Zebardast N, Friedman DS, Boland MV, Wang M. Transformer-Based Deep Learning Prediction of 10-Degree Humphrey Visual Field Tests From 24-Degree Data. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024 08 01; 13(8):11.

View in: PubMed
Pang Y, Bang JW, Kasi A, Li J, Parra C, Fieremans E, Wollstein G, Schuman JS, Wang M, Chan KC. Contributions of Brain Microstructures and Metabolism to Visual Field Loss Patterns in Glaucoma Using Archetypal and Information Gain Analyses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2024 07 01; 65(8):15.

View in: PubMed
Bowd C, Belghith A, Rezapour J, Jonas JB, Hyman L, Weinreb RN, Zangwill LM. Wide-Field Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging Improves Rate of Change Detection in Progressing Glaucomatous Eyes Compared With Standard-Field Imaging. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2024 07 01; 65(8):18.

View in: PubMed
Schuman JS, Desai A, Lavinsky F. Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography to Predict Visual Field Loss. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2024 06 01; 142(6):538-539.

View in: PubMed
Leshno A, Bommakanti N, De Moraes CG, Gordon MO, Kass MA, Cioffi GA, Liebmann JM. Visual field progression patterns in the ocular hypertension treatment study correspond to vulnerability regions of the disc. Eye (Lond). 2024 Jun; 38(8):1549-1555.

View in: PubMed
Tsiogka A, Moster ML, Chatzistefanou KI, Karmiris E, Samoli E, Giachos I, Droutsas K, Papaconstantinou D, Spaeth GL. The TsiogkaSpaeth grid for detection of neurological visual field defects: a validation study. Neurol Sci. 2024 Jun; 45(6):2869-2875.

View in: PubMed
Chia ZK, Kong AW, Turner ML, Saifee M, Damato BE, Backus BT, Blaha JJ, Schuman JS, Deiner MS, Ou Y. Assessment of Remote Training, At-Home Testing, and Test-Retest Variability of a Novel Test for Clustered Virtual Reality Perimetry. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2024 Mar-Apr; 7(2):139-147.

View in: PubMed
Fanton FL, Picetti E, Rodrigues SF, Moreira TS, Lindenmeyer RL, Lavinsky F, Pakter HM. Glaucoma suspects referred by general ophthalmologists to a tertiary center in Brazil: outcomes of the glaucoma specialist assessment. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2023 May-Jun; 86(3):248-254.

View in: PubMed
Villasana GA, Bradley C, Elze T, Myers JS, Pasquale L, De Moraes CG, Wellik S, Boland MV, Ramulu P, Hager G, Unberath M, Yohannan J. Improving Visual Field Forecasting by Correcting for the Effects of Poor Visual Field Reliability. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2022 05 02; 11(5):27.

View in: PubMed
Gardiner SK, Kinast RM, De Moraes CG, Budenz DL, Jeoung JW, Lind JT, Myers JS, Nouri-Mahdavi K, Rhodes LA, Strouthidis NG, Chen TC, Mansberger SL. Clinicians' Use of Quantitative Information while Assessing the Rate of Functional Progression in Glaucoma. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2022 Sep-Oct; 5(5):498-506.

View in: PubMed

People

Explore

Similar Concepts

Top Journals

The Thomas Jefferson University web site, its contents and programs, is provided for informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as medical advice nor is it intended to create any physician-patient relationship. Please remember that this information should not substitute for a visit or a consultation with a health care provider. The views or opinions expressed in the resources provided do not necessarily reflect those of Thomas Jefferson University, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, or the Jefferson Health System or staff.
Please read our Privacy Statement