Peer Review

"Peer Review" is a descriptor in the National Library of Medicine's controlled vocabulary thesaurus, MeSH (Medical Subject Headings). Descriptors are arranged in a hierarchical structure, which enables searching at various levels of specificity.

MeSH information

Definition | Details | More General Concepts | Related Concepts | More Specific Concepts

An organized procedure carried out by a select committee of professionals in evaluating the performance of other professionals in meeting the standards of their specialty. Review by peers is used by editors in the evaluation of articles and other papers submitted for publication. Peer review is used also in the evaluation of grant applications. It is applied also in evaluating the quality of health care provided to patients.

Descriptor ID	D010380
MeSH Number(s)	F01.829.316.549 I01.880.604.640 N03.706.700
Concept/Terms	Peer Review Peer Review Review, Peer Peer Reviews Reviews, Peer

Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more general than "Peer Review".

Psychiatry and Psychology [F]
Behavior and Behavior Mechanisms [F01]
Psychology, Social [F01.829]
Group Processes [F01.829.316]
Peer Review [F01.829.316.549]
Anthropology, Education, Sociology and Social Phenomena [I]
Social Sciences [I01]
Sociology [I01.880]
Social Control, Formal [I01.880.604]
Peer Review [I01.880.604.640]
Health Care [N]
Health Care Economics and Organizations [N03]
Social Control, Formal [N03.706]
Peer Review [N03.706.700]

Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more specific than "Peer Review".

publications

Timeline | Most Recent

This graph shows the total number of publications written about "Peer Review" by people in this website by year, and whether "Peer Review" was a major or minor topic of these publications.

Bar chart showing 20 publications over 11 distinct years, with a maximum of 3 publications in 2011 and 2012

To see the data from this visualization as text, click here.

Year	Major Topic	Minor Topic	Total
2006	0	2	2
2008	1	0	1
2009	1	1	2
2010	0	1	1
2011	3	0	3
2012	2	1	3
2017	0	1	1
2018	0	1	1
2020	1	1	2
2021	1	1	2
2023	1	1	2

Below are the most recent publications written about "Peer Review" by people in Profiles.

Lambrechts MJ, Schroeder GD, Kia C, Makanji HS. Is it Time to Change the Peer Review Process? Clin Spine Surg. 2023 07 01; 36(6):221-223.

View in: PubMed
Kachooei A, Bachoura A, Hirsch D, Beredjiklian PK. Predatory Journals in Orthopaedic Surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2023 Feb 15; 31(4):181-188.

View in: PubMed
Sataloff RT, Bush ML, Chandra R, Chepeha D, Fisher EW, Goldenberg D, Hanna EY, Kerschner JE, Kraus DH, Krouse JH, Li D, Link M, Lustig LR, Selesnick SH, Sindwani R, Smith RJ, Tysome J, Weber PC, Welling DB. Systematic and other reviews: Criteria and complexities. Am J Otolaryngol. 2021 Sep-Oct; 42(5):102957.

View in: PubMed
Kalavar M, Watane A, Wu D, Sridhar J, Mruthyunjaya P, Parikh R. Single-Blind and Double-Blind Peer Review: Effects on National Representation. Semin Ophthalmol. 2022 Jan 02; 37(1):11-16.

View in: PubMed
Lee RK, Cohen M, David N, Matalon T. Transitioning to Peer Learning: Lessons Learned. J Am Coll Radiol. 2021 Mar; 18(3 Pt B):499-506.

View in: PubMed
Jette DU, Hunter SJ, Burkett L, Langham B, Logerstedt DS, Piuzzi NS, Poirier NM, Radach LJL, Ritter JE, Scalzitti DA, Stevens-Lapsley JE, Tompkins J, Zeni J. Physical Therapist Management of Total Knee Arthroplasty. Phys Ther. 2020 08 31; 100(9):1603-1631.

View in: PubMed
Barnhart KT, Legro RS, Scott RT. Data sharing requirements: perspectives from three authors. Fertil Steril. 2018 01; 109(1):44-47.

View in: PubMed
Butler JS, Sebastian AS, Kaye ID, Wagner SC, Morrissey PB, Schroeder GD, Kepler CK, Vaccaro AR. Understanding Traditional Research Impact Metrics. Clin Spine Surg. 2017 05; 30(4):164-166.

View in: PubMed
Morgan S, Littman L, Palmer C, Singh G, LaRiccia PJ. A short guide to peer-reviewed, MEDLINE-indexed complementary and alternative medicine journals. Holist Nurs Pract. 2012 May-Jun; 26(3):164-72.

View in: PubMed
Cui Y, Galvin JM, Parker W, Breen S, Yin FF, Cai J, Papiez LS, Li XA, Bednarz G, Chen W, Xiao Y. Implementation of remote 3-dimensional image guided radiation therapy quality assurance for radiation therapy oncology group clinical trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Jan 01; 85(1):271-7.

View in: PubMed

People

Explore

Similar Concepts

Top Journals

The Thomas Jefferson University web site, its contents and programs, is provided for informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as medical advice nor is it intended to create any physician-patient relationship. Please remember that this information should not substitute for a visit or a consultation with a health care provider. The views or opinions expressed in the resources provided do not necessarily reflect those of Thomas Jefferson University, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, or the Jefferson Health System or staff.
Please read our Privacy Statement