Peer Review

"Peer Review" is a descriptor in the National Library of Medicine's controlled vocabulary thesaurus, MeSH (Medical Subject Headings). Descriptors are arranged in a hierarchical structure, which enables searching at various levels of specificity.

MeSH information

Definition | Details | More General Concepts | Related Concepts | More Specific Concepts

An organized procedure carried out by a select committee of professionals in evaluating the performance of other professionals in meeting the standards of their specialty. Review by peers is used by editors in the evaluation of articles and other papers submitted for publication. Peer review is used also in the evaluation of grant applications. It is applied also in evaluating the quality of health care provided to patients.

Descriptor ID	D010380
MeSH Number(s)	F01.829.316.549 I01.880.604.640 N03.706.700
Concept/Terms	Peer Review Peer Review Review, Peer Peer Reviews Reviews, Peer

Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more general than "Peer Review".

Psychiatry and Psychology [F]
Behavior and Behavior Mechanisms [F01]
Psychology, Social [F01.829]
Group Processes [F01.829.316]
Peer Review [F01.829.316.549]
Anthropology, Education, Sociology and Social Phenomena [I]
Social Sciences [I01]
Sociology [I01.880]
Social Control, Formal [I01.880.604]
Peer Review [I01.880.604.640]
Health Care [N]
Health Care Economics and Organizations [N03]
Social Control, Formal [N03.706]
Peer Review [N03.706.700]

Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more specific than "Peer Review".

publications

Timeline | Most Recent

This graph shows the total number of publications written about "Peer Review" by people in this website by year, and whether "Peer Review" was a major or minor topic of these publications.

Bar chart showing 21 publications over 13 distinct years, with a maximum of 4 publications in 2011 and 2012

To see the data from this visualization as text, click here.

Year	Major Topic	Minor Topic	Total
2006	0	2	2
2007	1	0	1
2008	1	0	1
2009	2	0	2
2010	0	1	1
2011	3	1	4
2012	1	3	4
2016	0	1	1
2018	0	1	1
2020	1	0	1
2021	0	1	1
2022	1	0	1
2023	0	1	1

Below are the most recent publications written about "Peer Review" by people in Profiles.

Kachooei A, Bachoura A, Hirsch D, Beredjiklian PK. Predatory Journals in Orthopaedic Surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2023 Feb 15; 31(4):181-188.

View in: PubMed
Stark M, Markowitz M, Woods B. Predatory Publishing Practices. Clin Spine Surg. 2022 04 01; 35(3):127-128.

View in: PubMed
Sataloff RT, Bush ML, Chandra R, Chepeha D, Fisher EW, Goldenberg D, Hanna EY, Kerschner JE, Kraus DH, Krouse JH, Li D, Link M, Lustig LR, Selesnick SH, Sindwani R, Smith RJ, Tysome J, Weber PC, Welling DB. Systematic and other reviews: Criteria and complexities. Am J Otolaryngol. 2021 Sep-Oct; 42(5):102957.

View in: PubMed
Lee RK, Cohen M, David N, Matalon T. Transitioning to Peer Learning: Lessons Learned. J Am Coll Radiol. 2021 Mar; 18(3 Pt B):499-506.

View in: PubMed
Barnhart KT, Legro RS, Scott RT. Data sharing requirements: perspectives from three authors. Fertil Steril. 2018 01; 109(1):44-47.

View in: PubMed
Krueger CA, Hsu JR, Belmont PJ. What to Read and How to Read It: A Guide for Orthopaedic Surgeons. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Feb 03; 98(3):243-9.

View in: PubMed
Jacobs AK, Kushner FG, Ettinger SM, Guyton RA, Anderson JL, Ohman EM, Albert NM, Antman EM, Arnett DK, Bertolet M, Bhatt DL, Brindis RG, Creager MA, DeMets DL, Dickersin K, Fonarow GC, Gibbons RJ, Halperin JL, Hochman JS, Koster MA, Normand SL, Ortiz E, Peterson ED, Roach WH, Sacco RL, Smith SC, Stevenson WG, Tomaselli GF, Yancy CW, Zoghbi WA, Harold JG, He Y, Mangu PB, Qaseem A, Sayre MR, Somerfield MR. ACCF/AHA clinical practice guideline methodology summit report: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jan 15; 61(2):213-65.

View in: PubMed
Morgan S, Littman L, Palmer C, Singh G, LaRiccia PJ. A short guide to peer-reviewed, MEDLINE-indexed complementary and alternative medicine journals. Holist Nurs Pract. 2012 May-Jun; 26(3):164-72.

View in: PubMed
Qaseem A, Forland F, Macbeth F, Ollenschläger G, Phillips S, van der Wees P. Guidelines International Network: toward international standards for clinical practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med. 2012 Apr 03; 156(7):525-31.

View in: PubMed
Babalola O, Grant-Kels JM, Parish LC. Ethical dilemmas in journal publication. Clin Dermatol. 2012 Mar-Apr; 30(2):231-6.

View in: PubMed

People

Explore

Similar Concepts

Top Journals

The Thomas Jefferson University web site, its contents and programs, is provided for informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as medical advice nor is it intended to create any physician-patient relationship. Please remember that this information should not substitute for a visit or a consultation with a health care provider. The views or opinions expressed in the resources provided do not necessarily reflect those of Thomas Jefferson University, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, or the Jefferson Health System or staff.
Please read our Privacy Statement